Bachmann's unINTELLIGENT DESIGN

Flat earth theorist and category 5 moron Michelle Bachmann is back at it again to prove that the sh&t isn't that far from the bat with her latest opinions about what the children of America should learn in school. It appears she want's the kids as dumb as she is because she believes that religion trumps science and the Genesis story is somehow supported by science. She also thinks that the exclusion of "intelligent design" is a government conspiracy or some form of government censorship.

She explained that she believes "God created the earth" and issues such as the Second Law of Thermodynamics, irreducible complexity and the "the dearth of fossil record" need to be addressed.

Bachmann also stated, "If you look at scientists there is not a unanimity of agreement on the origins of life." She made similar remarks in 2006. Negative ghost rider, we got unanimous agreement, you just don't like the unanimous agreement's story, not enough clouds and angels.

"There are hundreds and hundreds of scientists, many of them holding Nobel Prizes, who believe in intelligent design," she said then.

She goes on to say, "What I support is putting all science on the table and then letting students decide." She added, "I don't think it's a good idea for government to come down on one side of scientific issue or another, when there is reasonable doubt on both sides."


Michelle Bachmann is the living example of why intelligent design doesn't hold water. Evolution is a proven fact you nitwit. Try taking a biology class and see evolutiona­ry change happen to single-cel­led creatures and some invertebra­tes right before your eyes, they're big enough.

If it wasn't for the study of bacteria evolution, we wouldn't have many of the antibiotic­s we have today, I forgot, a genie gives us medications. I think that this is a decided issue and only idiots continue to relitigate this. How is there reasonable doubt on science? Intelligent Design is NOT science. Why is there a problem or some debate when there isn't one really there? Claiming a scientist that believes in intelligent design is some sort of victory for religion is absurd. It just means they have a religious faith of some kind, not that they don't believe in science, which is a subject that apparently the corn dog deep throater has no knowledge of or any intellectual curiosity in. Does that influence their work? Highly unlikely.


One of the essences of science is that its findings can be used to make prediction­s, such as the length of time before the sun burns out, the trajectory and timing of comets, and the exact time and location of the path of totality for solar eclipses many years before they occur. For those who regard creationis­m as science, please provide one prediction derived from your "science" (that isn't dependent on traditiona­l science). If you can't, it's not science. Period. Not when the second, third coming of Jesus will be, the opening of the 7 seals, figuring out who the Anthchrist is, and hating people who aren't just like us. Religion should be discussed in a religion class, not a science class. Intelligent Design is no more scientific than the theory that the world rests on the back of a giant turtle being in an astronomy class.


If we are to treat religious concepts as having the same status as scientific concepts, virtually every scientific finding would have to be overturned­. Geology classes would have to include the idea that the earth was created in a week, and all DNA would need to show evidence of a single set of parents. In other words, every invention that is based on science must be an illusion--­it does not exist. We are walking around in a dream.

Michelle Bachmann's a dangerous demagogue, a science denier and a sophist leading the gullible, the zealots and the dumb. If you believe that Creationism is the same as Science, then yes, I mean you.


Let's let students decide that standing in a tub of water while holding on to a live electric wire and see if it's OK ... this woman is stupid and so are her followers.

They remind me of the saying: If Science is too hard for you, try Religion.

Thank God Michelle Bachmann isn't Black

That's the only positive thing that I have to say in regards to her. I hate that we share a gender and a profession, but she sounds like a lobotomized beauty queen when she speaks and you know how stupid they are. Today, she decided to expand on her founding father's working tirelessly to end slavery vampire statement. ABC's George Stephanopoulos asked the conservative congresswoman to address the statement, noting that many of the country's Founding Fathers, including Thomas Jefferson and George Washington, in fact had slaves and that slavery wasn't abolished until the Civil War. Here's an excerpt of the exchange that went down:

Bachmann: Well you know what’s marvelous is that in this country and under our constitution, we have the ability when we recognize that something is wrong to change it. And that’s what we did in our country. We changed it. We no longer have slavery. That’s a good thing. And what our Constitution has done for our nation is to give us the basis of freedom unparalleled in the rest of the world.
 
Stephanopoulos: I agree with that…
 
Bachmann: That’s what people want...they realize our government is taking away our freedom.




Stephanopoulos: But that’s not what you said. You said that the Founding Fathers worked tirelessly to end slavery.

Bachmann: Well if you look at one of our Founding Fathers, John Quincy Adams, that’s absolutely true. He was a very young boy when he was with his father serving essentially as his father’s secretary. He tirelessly worked throughout his life to make sure that we did in fact one day eradicate slavery...

Stephanopoulos: He wasn’t one of the Founding Fathers – he was a president, he was a Secretary of State, he was a member of Congress, you’re right he did work to end slavery decades later. But so you are standing by this comment that the Founding Fathers worked tirelessly to end slavery?

Bachmann: Well, John Quincy Adams most certainly was a part of the Revolutionary War era. He was a young boy but he was actively involved.

A founding father that was a young boy?! He was 9 years old. Let's throw Superman into this too, since he can fly and reverse time. Of course Jeebus is a founding father, he did create the earth in order to give birth to himself and then save the earth all over again 2,000 years later. How much further can we lower the bar? I mean how can she expect to be taken seriously as a Presidential contender and she doesn't know John Q. Adams was the 6th President and hardly a founding father. We learned this stuff in middle school, typically with a song or some rhyme to remember all the President's of the US. This is laughable, but it's also sad, because she believes, truly believes that Obama with all of his flaws is afraid of her based on her intellectual abilities. She thinks that he some how is afraid of a debate on the issues and is a serious substantive competitor. In her world, Obama and his team will do whatever they can do diminish her because of their intense fear of her. This from the person that leads the tea party, who believes that the Revolutionary War began in New Hampshire and not Massachusetts (Boston TEA PARTY). This is like Manny Paqiano fighting an emaciated child, no competition. Maybe she is just faking it till she makes it. My shih-tzu wouldn't be afraid to debate Michelle Bachmann. I would feel totally comfortable going out for 3 nights straight with Amy Winehouse, drinking Four Loko, smoking crack, smearing myself with peanut butter and having orgies with random want to be rappers named Tron and debate Michelle Bachmann and I'm confident I could win. Her Congressional district should be embarrassed every time she opens her mouth after they finish laughing at every idiotic thing that comes out of that gaping hole that never closes. It seems that Intelligent Design and Flake History are taught at the same school and Bachmann and Palin along with the majority of the Republican field hold master's degree's.

If this rodeo clown is an example of the quality of presidenti­al political candidates in the US, Americans will soon again become the laughing stock of the world when her vacuous rhetoric, ignorance of American history and inability to be responsive to a question becomes more apparent. First she is channeling a gay serial killing clown now this... What is happening down there girls? Are Bachman and Palin drinking from the same suspect water supply? Are there bimbo republican pills?

It would only be worse if Bachmann were black...